Tag Archives: peer review

Metrics Remixed: The Times They Are a Webby

Posted on February 22, 2012 by

“See the mind at work and see the mind in work…” (from REMIXTHEBOOK review) “Until quite recently the complete justification for even the most complex scientific facts could be understood by a single person,” Michael Nielsen reminds us before describing … Continue reading →

Posted in Open Access | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Open Access Comments: June’s Featured News

Posted on June 30, 2011 by

Open Access Comments is a new website with daily feed of news that will focus on conversations around open access, open licensing, open students, open scientists, open repositories, open libraries and similar open values. I invite you to join the … Continue reading →

Posted in InTech, Open Access, Open Access Tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

InTech: 8,000 authors favour Open Access and see direct evidence of the positive impact

Posted on May 18, 2011 by

InTech, an Open Access publisher, has finally made available results from a recent survey of over 8,000 of our authors to determine their attitudes towards Open Access. The benefits of the Open Access (OA) model continue to be debated by … Continue reading →

Posted in InTech, InTech Books, Open Access, Peer Review | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Would Ginsberg Write To Open Access?

Posted on November 22, 2010 by

So this Green Automobile I give you in flight, a present, a present from my imagination. (Allen Ginsberg, The Green Automobile) What if Allen Ginsberg had “invented imagined and visioned” his green automobile driving petabytes of data through nodded cables … Continue reading →

Posted in Creative Commons, Open Access, Open Education | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Open Access Peer Review – Which One? Any One?

Posted on October 14, 2010 by

There’s been much talk lately about peer review techniques in Open Access publishing, and special attention was paid to it at Scholarly Kitchen. Yet another hard question is posed upon Open Access advocates who are to regulate the new and … Continue reading →

Posted in Open Access, Peer Review | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments